Oil Companies Looking At Permanent Refinery Cutbacks

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 10, 2010

The response to slumping gasoline use would likely mean higher prices for drivers.  

 

Some of the nation’s biggest oil companies are looking at permanently reducing how much gasoline and diesel fuel they make, a move that analysts say would almost certainly trigger higher prices for drivers.

Energy companies are suffering huge losses from refining because of slumping gasoline use — a product of the economic downturn and changing consumer habits and preferences. Energy experts say refining cutbacks have already begun and will accelerate as corporations strive for profits.

Major refiners have been circumspect about their plans, saying they are considering options that could include closing refineries, selling parts of their operations, laying off workers or slashing spending.

“Refineries will have to be closed,” said Fadel Gheit, senior energy analyst with Oppenheimer & Co. “Unless this excess capacity is permanently shuttered, a recovery in refining margins is unsustainable.”

This week, Chevron Corp. launched an overhaul of its fuel-making and retailing business with a plan to cut at least 2,000 jobs, put a refinery in Wales up for sale and take a hard look at its Hawaii refinery.

Royal Dutch Shell said it is reviewing its refinery operations with the idea of keeping only those with the best growth potential. Sunoco Inc. has sold one plant and said last month that its previously idled Eagle Point, N.J., refinery was being shut down permanently.

Valero Energy Corp., the nation’s largest refiner, last year closed a Delaware refinery, laying off 500 workers, and mothballed a plant in Aruba.

“We’re actually assessing the entire East Coast, whether we should be there or not,” Valero Chief Executive William R. Klesse told executives at a recent energy summit.

Energy industry executives say they are facing up to what was previously inconceivable: that the nation’s appetite for petroleum products may never return to levels seen earlier in the decade, even if a strong economic recovery takes hold.

“None of us will sell more gasoline than we did in 2007,” Tony Heyward, group chief executive for oil giant BP, said during a recent earnings teleconference.

“We know from internal documents from the last time we had a situation like this, in the 1990s, that there was an intentional strategy on the part of some companies to drive up profit margins by shuttering or closing refineries,” said Tyson Slocum, director of Public Citizen’s energy program. “Consumer prices will be acutely sensitive to any significant change in refining capacity.”

The recession contributed to declining fuel demand. But in that same period, vast — some think permanent — changes happened.

Americans drove less and switched to vehicles that got better mileage or didn’t use gasoline at all. They used mass transit in record numbers. Baby boomers began retiring and stopped commuting. And gasoline gained even more of something that didn’t have to be refined from oil — ethanol.

Few in the refining industry saw what was happening. The belief, particularly after hurricanes Katrina and Rita temporarily devastated the Gulf Coast petroleum network in 2005, was that more refineries were needed.

Critics complained that no new U.S. refinery had been built since 1976, leaving the country’s gasoline supplies vulnerable. In fact, between 1998 and 2009, U.S. refining capacity increased by 2.2 million barrels a day, to 17.67 million barrels a day, by adding equipment and improving processes at existing facilities, Energy Department data show.

Refiners raked in big profits from 2003 to 2006, but “by 2007, it was largely over,” said Tom Kloza, chief oil analyst for the Oil Price Information Service, an energy information firm in Wall, N.J. “Now, along with very weak demand numbers for gasoline, everything points to biofuels getting a larger and larger share in the future.”

Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times

Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 10, 2010

There are two considerations here…….

1. Wall Street owns Washington and derivatives are their main source of income. That makes it doubtful that meaningful changes will occur.


 2. The argument will be that they did not play the euro short via CDS pressure on debt. They are correct. They played the debt itself short.

                                                                                         Jim Sinclair

 

CFTC Chairman Gensler Urges End To Derivatives Secrecy
By Aline van Duyn
Financial Times, London
Wednesday, March 10, 2010

A leading US financial regulator on Tuesday called for the prices of derivatives trades to be disclosed in the same way as stock prices, saying only large Wall Street banks benefited from the current lack of transparency.

Gary Gensler, chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), said standard credit default swaps and other privately traded over-the-counter derivatives needed drastic reform, reflecting their role in the financial crisis.

His call came as European leaders including Angela Merkel, German chancellor, called for a clampdown on speculative trading in sovereign credit default swaps, which offer investors protection against a government default.

“The only parties that benefit from a lack of transparency are Wall Street dealers,” Mr Gensler told a New York derivatives conference. “Right now we have a dealer-dominated world, and that nearly drove us off a cliff.”

Mr Gensler, a former Goldman Sachs executive, said: “To promote public transparency, standard over-the-counter derivatives should be traded on exchanges or other trading platforms.” He also called for explicit regulation of derivatives dealers and the use of clearing for standard OTC derivatives.

Interesting Tid Bit About The Black Plague Epidemic Back Around The Year 1349

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 10, 2010

From Art Cashin on the floor of the NYSE………

On this day in 1349, in the midst of the infamous Black Plague epidemic, the forces of government, science and academia came together with a plan to save the people.  As you recall from earlier episodes, the Black Plague had spread from the eastern Mediterranean throughout most of Europe killing millions over the preceding three years.  People searched everywhere for the source of the plague…..a heavenly curse; a burden of immigrants; the result of spices in the food.  It was tough to figure however, since whenever they held a conference either the host area caught the plague or the visitors did…..so…..not too many conferences.

Then in the six months preceding this date the death rate leveled off…..or seemed to.  So in castles and universities and town halls across Europe, great minds pondered the cause of the plague.  And they came pretty close.  The collective governmental/academic wisdom was that the source of the Black Plague was fleas – (absolutely correct).

So the word went out from town to town across Europe – to stop the plague – kill the fleas -by killing all the dogs.  And immediately the slaughter of all dogs began.

But like lots of well-intentioned governmental/academic ideas it was somewhat wide of the mark…and had unexpected consequences.  The cause was fleas alright but not dog fleas…..it was rat fleas.  And in the 1300’s what was the most effective way to hold down the rat population…..you guessed it – dogs.  So by suggesting that townsfolk kill their dogs, the wise authorities had unwittingly allowed the rat population to flourish and thus a new vicious rash of Black Plague began.  Before it was over, three years later, nearly 1 out of 3 people in the world had died of the plague.

(Historic footnote…..Published sources say that with so many people dying, millions of estates had to be settled – result…..the fallout of the plague was a huge growth in….the number of lawyers.)

Gramps Says….Hey, Just Relax

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 9, 2010

Gramps Say's Relax

Stratfor……China’s Challenge

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 9, 2010

China’s Challenge

March 9, 2010 | 0958 GMT

 

By Jennifer Richmond and Rodger Baker

China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) remains in session. As usual, the meeting has provided Beijing an opportunity to highlight the past year’s successes and lay out the problems that lie ahead. On the surface at least, China has shown remarkable resilience in the face of global economic crisis. It has posted enviable gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates while keeping factories running (if at a loss) and workers employed. But the economic crisis has exposed the inefficiencies of China’s export-dependent economic model, and the government has had to pump money into a major investment stimulus package to make up for the net drain the export sector currently is exacting on the economy.

Related Special Topic Page

China’s Economic Imbalance

For years, China’s leaders have recognized the risks of the current economic model. They have debated policy ideas to shift from the current model to one that is more sustainable in the long run and incorporates a more geographically equitable growth and a hefty rise in domestic consumption. While there is general agreement on the need for change, top leaders disagree on the timing and method of transition. This has stirred internal debates, which can lead to factionalization as varying interests align to promote their preferred policy prescription. Entrenched interests in urban areas and the export industry — along with constant fears of triggering major social upheaval — have left the government year after year making only slight changes around the margins. Often, Beijing has taken one step forward only to take two back when social instability and/or institutional resistance emerge.

And this debate becomes even more significant now, as China deals simultaneously with the aftermath of the global economic slowdown and preparations for a leadership transition in 2012.

The Hu Agenda

Chinese President Hu Jintao came into office eight years ago with the ambitious goal of closing a widening wealth gap by equalizing economic growth between the rural interior and coastal cities. Hu inherited the results of Deng Xiaoping’s opening and reform, which focused on the rapid development of the coastal areas, which were better geographically positioned for international trade. The vast interior took second billing, being kept in line with the promise that in time the rising tide of economic wealth would float all ships. Eventually it did, somewhat. But while the interior saw significant improvements over the early Mao period, the growth and rise in living standards and disposable income in the urban coastal areas far outstripped rural growth. Some coastal urban areas are now approaching Western standards of living, while much of the interior remains mired in Third World conditions. And the faster the coast grows, the more dependent China becomes on the money from that growth to facilitate employment and subsidize the rural population.

Hu’s predecessor, Jiang Zemin, also recognized these problems. To address them, he promoted a “Go West” economic policy designed to shift investment further inland. But Jiang faced the same entrenched interests that have opposed Hu’s efforts at significant change. While Jiang was able to begin reform of the bloated state-owned enterprises, he softened his Westward economic drive. Amid cyclical global economic downturns, China fell back on the subsidized export model to keep employment levels up and keep money flowing in. Concern over social instability held radical reform in check, and the closer Jiang got to the end of his term in power, the less likely he was to make significant changes that could undermine social cohesion. No Chinese leader wants to preside over a major economic policy that fails out of fear of being the Chinese Mikhail Gorbachev.

For those like Hu who have argued that rapid reform is worth the risk of potential short-term social dislocation, the global downturn was seen as validating their policies — and as confirming that the risks to China of not changing far outweigh the risks of changing now. The export industry’s drag on GDP has forced Beijing to enact a massive investment and loan program. By some accounts, fixed investments in 2009 accounted for more than 90 percent of GDP. Those arguing for faster reform have noted that the pace of investment growth is unsustainable in the long run, and that the flood of money into the system has created new inflationary pressures.

Much of this investment came in the form of bank loans that need to be serviced and repaid. But as the government tries to cool the economy, the risk of companies defaulting on their loans looms. Cooling the economy also threatens to burst China’s real estate bubble. This not only compounds problems in related industry sectors, it could also trigger massive social discord in the urban areas, where housing has taken the place of the stock market as the investment of choice.

Beijing’s Ongoing Dilemma

Chinese leaders face the constant dilemma of needing to allow the economy to maintain its three-decade long export-oriented growth pattern even though this builds in long-term weaknesses, but shifting the economy is not something that can be done without its own consequences. Social pressures are convincing the government of the need to raise the minimum wage to keep up with economic pressures. At the same time, misallocation of labor and new job formation incentives in the interior are causing shortages of labor in some sectors in major coastal export zones. If coastal factories increase wages to attract labor or appease workers, they run the risk of going under due to the already razor-thin margins. But if they don’t, the labor fueling these industries at best may riot and at worst might simply move back home, leaving exporters with little option but to close shop.

Looming demographic changes around the globe also impact the Chinese situation, and the government can no longer rely on an ever-increasing export market to drive the Chinese economy. Some international companies operating in China already are beginning to consider relocating manufacturing operations to places with cheaper labor or back to their home countries to save on transportation costs Chinese wages are no longer mitigating.

With its export markets unlikely to recover to pre-crisis levels any time soon, competition and protectionism are on the rise. The United States is growing bolder in its restrictions on Chinese exports, and China may no longer avoid having the U.S. government label it a currency manipulator. While this may be an extreme measure in 2010, the pressures for such a scenario are rising.

Amid its domestic and global challenges, Chinese leaders are engaged in economic policy debates. It appears that internal criticism is being directed against Hu as social tensions over issues like rising housing prices and inflation grow. In some ways, this is not unusual. National presidents often bear the brunt of dissatisfaction with economic downturns no matter whether their policies were to blame. In China, however, criticism against economic policy falls on the premier, who is responsible for setting the country’s economic direction. The focus on Hu reflects both the depth of the current crisis and the underlying political tensions over economic policy in a time of both global economic unpredictability and preparations for the end of Hu’s presidency in 2012.

To bridge the gulf between the urban coast and the rural interior, Hu and his supporters have pursued a multiphased plan. First, they sought to rein in some of the most independent of the coastal areas — Shanghai in particular, which served as a center of power and influence not only in promoting the continuation of unfettered coastal growth but also of Hu’s predecessor, Jiang. Second, a plan was put in motion to consolidate redundancies in China’s economy and to shift light- and low-skilled industry inland by increasing wages in the key coastal export manufacturing areas, reducing their cost competitiveness. And Beijing added an urbanization drive in traditionally rural and inland areas. Together, this represented a joint attempt to bring the jobs to the interior rather than continue the pattern of migrant workers moving to the coast.

The core of the Hu policies was an overall attempt to re-centralize economic control. This would allow the central government to begin weeding out redundancies left over from Mao’s era of provincial self-sufficiency, which the Deng and Jiang eras of uncoordinated and locally-directed economic growth often driven by corruption and nepotism exacerbated. In short, Hu planned to centralize the economy to consolidate industry, redistribute wealth and urbanize the interior to create a more balanced economy that emphasized domestic consumption over exports. However, Hu’s push, under the epithet “harmonious society,” has been anything but smooth and its successes have been limited at best.

Hu Meets Resistance

Institutional and local government resistance to re-centralization has hounded the policy from its inception, and resistance has grown with the economic crisis. Money is now pouring into the economy via massive government-mandated bank lending to stimulate growth through investments as exports wane. Consequently, housing prices and inflation fears now plague the government — two issues that could lead to increased social tensions and are already leading to louder questioning of Hu’s policies. With just two years to go in his administration, Hu already is looking to his legacy, weighing the risks and rewards between promoting long-term economic sustainability or short-term economic survival. The next two years will witness seemingly incongruent policy pronouncements as the two opposing directions and their proponents battle over China’s economic and political landscape.

Hu’s rise to the presidency was all but assured long before he took office. From a somewhat simplified perspective, the PRC has had only four leaders: Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao. When Mao died, his appointed successor, Hua Guofeng (who was settled upon after several other candidates fell out of favor), lasted only a short time. Amid the political chaos of the post-Cultural Revolution era, Deng rose to the top. Both Mao and Deng were strong leaders who, although contending with rivals, could rule almost single-handedly when the need arose.

To avoid the confusion of the post-Mao transition, Deng created a long-term succession plan. He ultimately settled on Shanghai Mayor Jiang Zemin as his successor. But in an effort to preserve his vision and legacy, Deng also chose Jiang’s successor, Hu Jintao. Barring some terrible breach of office, Hu was more or less guaranteed the presidency a decade before he took office, and there was little Jiang could do to alter this outcome. Jiang, however, made sure that he left his mark by lining up Hu’s successor, Xi Jinping. Despite Jiang’s support, Xi has not risen through the ranks in the same manner as Hu did, raising speculation of internal disagreements on the succession plan.

Vice President Xi is considered one of the “princelings,” leaders whose parents were part of the revolutionary-era governments under Mao and Deng who mainly have cut their teeth through business ventures concentrated in the coastal regions. Hu, on the other hand, is considered among the “tuanpai” or “tuanxi,” leaders who come primarily from the ranks of the Communist Youth League and interior provinces. While these “groups” are not in and of themselves cohesive factions, and China’s political networks are complex, Hu’s and Xi’s backgrounds reflect their differing policy approaches. As such, the question of the next Chinese leader is shaped by opposing economic plans.

On one hand are those like Hu who support a more rapid and immediate refocusing on rural and interior economic growth, even at the cost of reduced coastal and urban power. On the other hand, those like Jiang and his protege Xi have an interest in maintaining the status quo of regionalized semi-independence in economic matters and continued strong coastal growth. They are proceeding on the assumption that a strong coastal-led economy will both provide more immediate rewards for themselves and strengthen China’s international position and its national defense.

It is important not to overstress the differences. Each has the same ultimate goal, namely, maintaining the CPC as the central authority and building a strong China; it is just their paths to these ends that differ. But the economic policy differences are now becoming key questions of Party survival and Chinese stability and strength. Factional struggles that in normal circumstances can be largely controlled, or at least would not get out of hand, are now shaping up in an environment where China’s three-decade economic growth spurt may be reaching its climax. Meanwhile, social pressures are rising amid uncertainties and instabilities in Chinese economic structures.

Beijing has emerged from the economic crisis bolder and more self-confident than ever. But this is driven more by a recognition of weakness than a false assessment of strength. China’s leadership is in crisis mode, and at this time of economic instability and uncertainty, the leadership must also manage a transition that is bringing competing economic policies into stark contrast. And this is the sort of pressure that can cause the gloves to come off and throw expectations of unity and smooth transitions out the window.

Everything may pass smoothly; two years is a long time, after all. But if there is one thing certain about the upcoming change of presidents, it is that nothing is certain

Reprinting or republication of this report on websites is authorized by prominently displaying the following sentence at the beginning or end of the report, including the hyperlink to STRATFOR:

“This report is republished with permission of STRATFOR

It’s Starting To Happin Every Day….Top Aide Says Toledo Likely To Face “Fiscal Emergency”

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 9, 2010

It is happening everywhere. There is no way out that supports political expedience other than “QE to infinity.” If the Fed doesn’t play ball they are history.  The shot caller is political expediency.            Jim Sinclair

Top Bell aide says Toledo likely to face ‘fiscal emergency’
Potential strategy to secure labor concessions disputed.


By IGNAZIO MESSINA

Unless there is a fundamental change in the way Toledo’s government operates, the city will likely be unable to pay its employees before the year is through, a top official in the Bell administration warned.

That looming financial disaster leads people such as Mayor Mike Bell and Councilman D. Michael Collins to throw out words like “bankruptcy” or “receivership,” two feared terms but ones that are not likely to become reality.

The truth is that receivership or bankruptcy is probably not an option for the city anytime soon. But being slapped by the state as a “fiscal emergency” municipality is a real threat – a label some dislike but others advise Toledo to embrace given its $48 million deficit.

“If you cannot make payroll for 30 days, you are there. You are in fiscal emergency,” said Deputy Mayor of Operations Steve Herwat, Mr. Bell’s right-hand man.

“If we don’t get this budget balanced, and the imbalance is enough, and yes it is, we are at risk,” he said.

http://toledoblade.com/article/20100307/NEWS16/3070305/0/COLUMNIST39

See Ya Later Alligator………

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 9, 2010

Beverly Hillbillies Moven Back Home

http://jsmineset.com/

Good Luck…..EU, Merkel Urge Swap Regulation As Greece Takes Plea To U.S.

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 9, 2010

EU, Merkel Urge Swap Regulation as Greece Takes Plea to U.S.
By Rainer Buergin and Ben Moshinsky

March 9 (Bloomberg) — The European Union’s top regulatory official said the bloc will consider banning “purely speculative” credit-default swaps as German Chancellor Angela Merkel called for a crackdown on derivatives trading to prevent a rerun of the Greek financial crisis.

European Commission President Jose Barroso said today the 27-nation region will “examine closely the relevance of banning purely speculative naked sales on credit-default swaps.” Merkel, speaking before Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou meets PresidentBarack Obama in Washington today, said the EU must take the lead in curbing derivatives.

“We’re of the opinion that a quick implementation of actions in the area of CDS has to happen,” Merkel told reporters in Luxembourg. Citing “ongoing speculation against euro-region countries,” she called for the “fastest possible” implementation of new rules.

European leaders are ratcheting up the pressure for global regulation of derivatives amid the Greek fiscal crisis. The commission, the EU’s executive arm, will also propose creating a lender of last resort to aid cash-strapped members such as Greece, a proposal that has divided the region’s leaders.

Papandreou said in a speech in Washington yesterday that “unprincipled speculators” threatened a new global financial crisis and said he’d press Obama to support EU efforts to target speculation.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=agj7D9vZDDvE

SULTANS OF SWAP…..Fearing The Gearing!

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 9, 2010

SULTANS OF SWAP:  Fearing the Gearing! 

Ever imagine getting your tie caught in a mechanical set of gears (sorry ladies – but I will spare you). The results are nasty! Now you know what the Sultans of Swap in the $695 Trillion global OTC derivatives market feel like. Every day the slow moving gears of the world economies relentlessly grind, making it harder and harder for the Sultans to wiggle loose or breath.

Financial Gearing is what we non-accountants often refer to as simply ‘Leverage’.  Whichever your preference, it has the Sultans of Swap tightly caught in a manner that has greatly restricted their options and is now slowly squeezing the liquidity life out of them.

As the economies of the world adjust to the comatose shock of the Financial Crisis, the general public is only now awakening to the fall-out and structural changes resulting from this historic tremor. Some impacts are obvious; the most important are not – yet!

We hear the word ‘de-leveraging’ almost daily as a tag line whenever the word ‘bank’ is used. We often hear it when people discuss the amount of debt the public took on during the housing bubble and are now trying to get out from under. So we think we know what there is to know about leverage. Whoa… are we considering all the users and forms of leverage?

The near collapse of the Shadow Banking mechanism and its exotic gearing instruments such as SIV, VIE, and SPE working in conjunction with operatives such as highly leveraged hedge & private equity funds, has left our highly credit reliant global economies beached. These economies are presently attempting to swim once again but with pre-crisis business models within a greatly diminished credit creation infrastructure. We sense something isn’t working like it did before, but it is much too simplistic to say it is because credit is more difficult to secure.

We have staggering numbers of enterprises that have come into existence or grown to unsustainable sizes, solely on the basis of the application of leverage. Like mortgage brokers, appraisers, developers, listing agents, PMI insurers and a raft of other occupations that exploded during the housing bubble, they have collapsed just as quickly with de-leveraging. Economists call it mal-investment. The lay person calls it ‘unemployment’.

We need to understand more fully the adjustments associated with de-leveraging or “Reverse Gearing”. As I mentioned, some might call it de-leveraging but that distracts from the magnitude and scale of what we are presently experiencing. I like the formal accounting terminology ‘reverse gearing’; because it makes it crystal clear the machinery is headed in a different direction.

FINANCIAL GEARING:  Systemic Growth of Leverage

Financial Gearing is about any entity increasing debt on its asset liability ledger relative to its earnings, equity or capital base. By increasing debt it potentially allows for greater profits or returns to be made. As in Housing, it is good to have a small down payment and a large mortgage when housing values are increasing. “Leverage” in this case is positive. However, when housing prices fall OR interest rates increase, debt leverage levels can be crippling. A virtuous rising cycle becomes a vicious death spiral.

When we use the terms interest and asset prices as we just did, you can be assured that the next sentence will have something to do with the Wall Street magicians plying their crafty trade. They are insidious in unlocking the strategies that live in the world of price, rate and time differentials. None are more shrewd nor pervasive than the Sultans of Swap.

Let’s have a quick ‘look see’ at how the post financial crisis looks to some key sectors and where the Sultans of Swap with their portly derrieres have their ties caught.

A)  NON FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS

The US is no longer primarily a manufacturing economy nor a service economy. The US has been operating as a Financial Economy since the Dot Com bubble. To survive and indeed prosper in this Financial Economy, corporate America was forced to use its balance sheet both as an engine of growth and as a corporate defense. Multi-national conglomerates have aggressively practiced this for the last decade. Exactly the same way the financial & banking industry is structured to “borrowing short and lend long”, American industry has steadily shortened its lending duration to shorter and shorter, less costly, short-term financing. The use of Commercial Paper, easily rolled over on monthly and quarterly periods, was substantially cheaper than issuing longer term corporate notes and bonds. Corporations like GM (GMAC), Ford (Ford Credit), GE (GE Capital) had long ago stopped being industrial corporations. They were financial corporation’s leveraging their highly competitive credit ratings to borrow extensively while ‘leveraging-up’ their balance sheets. Corporations were quick to realize it gave them an unfair competitive advantage in the new emerging world of financial engineering. The less sophisticated were forced to follow or be ‘gobbled up” by competitors with elevated stock valuations.

Recent earnings results have showed us clearly that earnings are now being achieved by brutal cost cutting efforts to offset revenue shrinkage. Existing “Lines of Credit” have become more expensive and harder to obtain, especially with satisfactory terms. “Covenant Lite” loans are now due. Roll-Over of funding needs are more onerous.

Funding sources, terms and availability have changed adversely and for the foreseeable future. Corporate America is now strategizing, planning and reacting to this new reality. Pimco call it the ‘new normal’ of smaller growth rates. It is called ‘accelerated unwinding’ in corporate board rooms. Increasing corporate cash hoards are your first signs. (1) 

The reason this recession is different is that it is a de-leveraging recession. We borrowed too much (all over the developed world) and now are forced to repair our balance sheets as the assets we bought have fallen in value (housing, bonds, securities, etc.). A new and very interesting (if somewhat long) study by the McKinsey Global Institute found that periods of overleveraging are often followed by 6-7 years of slow growth as the deleveraging process plays out. No quick fixes.

Let’s look at some of their main conclusions (and they have a solid ten-page executive summary, worth reading.) This analysis adds new details to the picture of how leverage grew around the world before the crisis and how the process of reducing it could unfold. Here is what McKinsey has to say and is listened to by global board rooms:

  • Leverage levels are still very high in some sectors of several countries – and this is a global problem, not just a US one.
  • To assess the sustainability of leverage, one must take a granular view using multiple sector-specific metrics. The analysis has identified ten sectors within five economies that have a high likelihood of deleveraging.
  • Empirically, a long period of deleveraging nearly always follows a major financial crisis.
  • Deleveraging episodes are painful, lasting six to seven years on average and reducing the ratio of debt to GDP by 25 percent. GDP typically contracts during the first several years and then recovers.
  • If history is a guide, many years of debt reduction are expected in specific sectors of some of the world’s largest economies, and this process will exert a significant drag on GDP growth.
  • Coping with pockets of deleveraging is also a challenge for business executives. The process portends a prolonged period in which credit is less available and more costly, altering the viability of some  business models and changing the attractiveness of different types of investments. In historic episodes, private investment was often quite low for the duration of deleveraging. Today, the household sectors of several countries have a high likelihood of deleveraging. If this happens, consumption growth will likely be slower than the pre-crisis trend, and spending patterns will shift. Consumer-facing businesses have already seen a shift in spending toward value-oriented goods and away from luxury goods, and this new pattern may persist while households repair their balance sheets. Business leaders will need flexibility to respond to such shifts.

You can read the entire report at their web site, including the ten-page summary. http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/publications/debt_and_deleveraging/index.asp

B)  PRIVATE EQUITY

Presently garnering little media coverage is the historic levels of leveraged buyouts that have taken place over the last decade using short term money, pre-financial crisis ‘covenant lite’ terms & extraordinarily geared balance sheets.

Private Equity firms “bought more than 3000 American corporations from 2000 to 2008, employing close to 10 million people – nearly 1 of every 10 workers in the private sector.

The formula was simple: buy a target company with a small down payment and lots of other people’s money. Leverage it with huge loans using the acquired company – not the Private Equity firm – as collateral. Cut short-term costs through radical layoffs. Resell at a profit within 5 years, before the cuts & debt have totally crippled the business.

In ten years Private Equity deals have generated more than $1 Trillion in new debt – which will come due just when these businesses are least likely to be able to pay it off. As a result it is forecasted that about half of all Private Equity owned companies will likely collapse between now and 2015, throwing 2 million people out of work” (2)

C)  BANKS & FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Bank Lending

The raison d’être of banks is the gearing or leverage of their balance sheets. The fractional reserve banking system allows the expansion of bank balance sheets but limits it with reserve requirements. However loans can be increased with more Capital infusions. The banks have over time, creatively found ways to utilize debt instruments as capital thereby fulfilling bank regulatory requirements. These debt instruments, which have been classified as Tier 1 Capital, are custom agreements typically not tradable that can only be valued by the use of extremely complex proprietary non-auditable bank models. The assumptions and variables used in these models make their ‘mark to market’ valuations much closer to ‘market to myth’. They are blatantly obscure and totally non transparent to investors. The problem is these ‘mystical assets’ have become such a large part of bank capital assets. This has fostered the recent explosion in bank lending, that current reclassification attempts by bank regulators and the implementation of the new  International Basel Banking definitions of Tier 1 Assets have led to significant conflicts and crippling potential problems for the banks. The solution to date has been to simply defer any changes until the credit crisis subsides. Since the investment  community is now aware of the problem but still cannot get enough information, investment professionals are skeptical of investing in banks, thereby allowing them to raise capital to allow for future ‘adjustments’.  

 If Tier 1 Capital problem is not enough, the banks have also been employing practices that simply kept alarming amounts of loans off their balance sheets completely. There are a broad range of practices used but the largest was the use of SIV’s or Structured Investment Vehicles.  Over the last decade SIV’s have been a major wheel in using low yielding public money market funds to foster the procurement of the toxic assets that have become so well covered by the media. Slowly the banks have had to pull these structures back on their balance sheets but at a very ‘measured’ and glacially slow rate.

 The government is presently keeping the yield curve at a historically steep rate, for a protracted period of time, to allow the banks time to attempt some sort of work-out. Unfortunately delinquencies and foreclosures on existing loans have reached such a level that the net result is barely any real resolution. Now collapsing Commercial Real Estate values are adding another truly massive problem to the mix. (3)

It is not only the major banks, or the regional banks (which are being taken over by the FDIC at approaching 3-5 per week – 140 since the crisis began) that have problems because of excessive gearing. Throughout the financial services industry the collapsing commercial real estate market is putting pressures on Insurance companies, Real Estate Developers, REITs, Property Management Corporations and a whole mix of financial services who are major holders of commercial real estate assets. Their balance sheet assets are collapsing, placing their solvency into question and minimally forcing a major contraction in any new activities.

 

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

TOTAL

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

552

560

537

480

459

2.7T

LEVERAGED BUY-OUT DEBT

71

113

203

294

406

 

HIGH YIELD DEBT

35

64

75

82

126

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

657

737

815

856

992

4.2T

SOURCE: Morgan Stanley, Fixed Income Research & Economics (4)

The above chart from Morgan Stanley, Fixed Income Research & Economics (4) indicates we will require $4.2 TRILLION in new financing to accommodate loans of questionable viability, existing lending terms or Loan to collateral value coming due.

D)  SOVEREIGN COUNTRIE

I have been very concerned about all of the items mentioned above, but my biggest concern is the staggering amounts of debt being increased almost daily – Sovereign Country Debt. This is not just a USA problem but global, as countries have taken on debt loads to be used for stimulus fiscal spending. This debt must be paid!

My recent article: “Eight Financial Fault Lines Appear In The Euro Experiment!” lays out the undeniable fractures that are occurring. The balance sheet gearing problem or rather “game” in this instance is how this debt is presently being funded. In the PIIGS there is large concern with how debt has been accounted for going back to the inception of the EU and what sovereign governments did to qualify and gain entry under the Maastricht Treaty.

Additionally, Governments are using the “Duration” game to hide the loads. Specifically they are borrowing on short term duration where interest expenses are extremely low versus locking in the loan on longer term bonds. The latter is the traditional manner governments employ to protect taxpayers from increases in interest rates. New debt and roll-over debt is being funded on less than 12-18 months terms. This is leaving accelerating balances of debt which will need re-funding in a year’s time. What happens if interest rates move up from unprecedented historically low rates to even moderately higher rates? Why would governments even consider such a strategy?

Credit Rating agencies are so concerned about the current situation that they have already started warning about sovereign credit rating downgrades and in some instances have downgraded countries such as Greece.

Downgrades immediately make new debt issuances for a sovereign country more expensive. Poor credit ratings and rising rates will quickly bankrupt any sovereign nation.

E)  REVERSE GEARING (DELEVERAGING) & ITS GLOBAL RAMIFICATIONS

Yield Curve

The LEX column in the Financial Times this week observes, concerning the report:

“It may be economically and politically sensible for governments to spend money on making life more palatable at the height of the crisis. But the longer countries go on before paying down their debt, the more painful and drawn-out the process is likely to be. Unless, of course, government bond investors revolt and expedite the whole shebang.”

And that is the crux of the matter. We have to raise $1 trillion-plus in the US from domestic sources. Great Britain has the GDP-equivalent task. So does much of Europe. Japan is simply off the radar. Japan, as I have noted, is a bug in search of a windshield.

Sometime in the coming few years the bond markets of the world will be tested. Normally a deleveraging cycle would be deflationary and lower interest rates would be the outcome. But in the face of such large deficits, with no home-grown source to meet them? That worked for Japan for 20 years, as their domestic markets bought their debt. But that process is coming to an end.

James Carville once famously remarked that when he died he wanted to come back as the bond market, because that is where the real power is. And I think we will find out all too soon what the bond vigilantes have to say.

And so we have uncertainty all around us. What will our taxes look like in the US in just 12 months? Health care? Who will finance the bonds, without a credible plan to reduce the deficit? And any plan that has Nancy Pelosi as its guarantor is by definition not credible. 

The Fed is going to stop the music in March. There will be a scramble for the chairs. This is a huge experiment with no precedent. The entire developed world is the test subject. Risk assets will be subject to uncertainty. And markets hate uncertainty.

SULTANS OF SWAP

I know many of you are worried about our Sultans of Swap with their ties caught in the gears. What does this mean to them? More importantly you ask, what does it mean to us all?

Through the magic mix of Credit Default Swaps, Dynamic Hedging and Interest Rate Swaps the Sultans of Swaps have effectively been controlling interest rate spreads. Through Regulatory Arbitrage they extorted tremendous political sway globally. They have existed in the world of risk free spreads. To them low interest rates simply attract more volume for their concoctions. But this has changed. Individuals, Corporations, Financial Institutions and Sovereigns all have more debt than they can handle. Is the global savings growth rate sufficient to handle further debt growth plus debt associated with possible compounding interest payments with unpaid balances and roll-overs? We are very likely nearing a global supply & demand cusp with China’s reserve growth rate slowing, but without question we are seeing and will see accelerated defaults from Commercial Real Estate (2) to Sovereign Debt.  We don’t need to see defaults. How many Greek Sovereign credit downgrades would it take to begin cascading collateral calls?  

“If the US administration’s budgetary projections are correct, the national debt to GDP ratio will climb from 40% in 2008 to 77.3% in 2020. Even if we are able to curb future deficits, it is likely that this ratio will grow over the next decade. As a result, rates on treasuries and other debt obligations are likely to climb over the coming decade with profound implications for the debt and stock markets.” (5). It is not a matter of ‘if’ – it is a matter of ‘when’. With $3.7T in Gross Derivative Credit Exposure outstanding we are talking some potentially very serious problems.  

As I outlined in “Sultans of Swap – Explaining $605 Trillion in Derivatives” significant amounts of debt today is hidden in the murky depths of “special” purpose instruments – like SPE, SPV & SPC or “Structured” entities– like SIV. This is done to keep debt off the balance sheet. Why would you not want something on the balance sheet where investors and interested parties could see what is happening? Obviously so you can camouflage them from what is happening. The reason is fundamentally Credit Ratings. Keep your debts low, your credit ratings high and the cost of money is cheap. The cheaper money is, the more borrowing will occur. Everyone is happy except the unwitting lender.

To the right I illustrate the simplest of interest rate swaps. What you need to appreciate is that everything is normally tied to LIBOR on the floating leg. LIBOR goes up, one party gets hurt. If rates go up either party could suffer credit rating downgrades. A credit rating downgrade can and often does trigger collateral calls. One of the parties then gets hurt. So any significant moves in interest rates and credit ratings and we have problems. With $3.7T in Gross Derivative Credit Exposure outstanding we are talking some potentially serious ‘hurting’.

What we need to differentiate is who exactly the Sultans of Swap are: Are they the Counterparties A & B who hold the OTC contract? Are they the third party that administers the ongoing payment exchanges? Are they the issuers or holders of CDS’s to protect against counterparty failure? Are they the magicians that put this OTC contract together, took a quick fee and rapidly left the scene? Are they the banks making almost obscene trading charges ($35B in 2009 trading fees alone (6)) on brokering these swaps from parties desperate to re-align contract bets since the financial tsunami arrived? Or is it all of them as cumulative ‘cohorts in crime’?

There is an old saying in poker parlance: “when you look around the table and you can’t tell who the patsy is – it is you!” I will leave it to you, shrewd reader, to determine who the patsy is and who the card shark is at this table! There is only one person holding a risk free winning hand. They may all be Sultans of Swap but there is only one Emir or Merlin here!

What is especially evident to many of these Sultans is that they have their ties clearly caught. They now foresee a rising LIBOR, likely Credit Rating downgrades, and probable collateral calls as inevitable in the ongoing process of reverse gearing. The gears just keep on turning.

Let me close with a point of clarification. For those of you having troubles understanding any of the above, let me relate a story. I was explaining swaps to a New Yorker who appeared to have no financial background. When I finished my ‘swaps in 100 words or less’ dissertation he simply nodded his head without any questions. He then looked me straight in the eye with a knowing expression and explained. “In New York if I owe the Mob $100 dollars and I can’t pay, but my best friend Bob owes me $100 and hasn’t paid me yet, then Bob owes the mob $100. A swap, right? Well, when the mob collects the $100 from Bob, and Bob now has a broken leg and refuses to ever talk to me again, I still owe the mob $50 for collection fees plus the ‘vig’ on the original $100. The mob is now up $150 and I desperately need more friends. A swap, right – yeh I understand!”

SOURCES:

(1) 03-04-10 With Fistfuls of Cash, Firms on Hunt  Wall Street Journal

(2)               “The Buyout of America” Josh Kosman, Penguin Group, 2009. Quotation from front jacket flap.

(3) 03-02-10 Realpoint Research Monthly Delinquency Report  .pdf  Realpoint

(4)              Wall of debt a barrier to US recovery – 12-16-09 – The Sydney Morning Herald, Malcolm Maiden

(5) 03-02-10 Obama’s Wake Up Call and What It Suggests for Future Interest Rates   Stephen Shefler

(6) 03-01-10 Frank, Peterson Vow to Eliminate Provision Keeping Swaps Opaque  Bloomberg

Mcinsey Global Institute http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/publications/debt_and_deleveraging/index.asp

Gordon T Long is not a registered advisor and does not give investment advice. His comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. While he believes his statements to be true, they always depend on the reliability of his own credible sources. Of course, he recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments.

 

© Copyright 2010 Gordon T Long. The information herein was obtained from sources which Mr. Long believes reliable, but he does not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that Mr. Long may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website. Mr. Long does not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security. You should consider this possibility before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you receive from him.

http://home.comcast.net/~lcmgroupe/2010/Article-Sultans_of_Swap-Fearing_the_Gearing.htm

Just Relaxing With No Place To Go. Hey, What’s There To Worry About Anyway……The Trains Not Due For Another Hour, But What If…….. Maybe World Stock Markets Are Thinking The Same Thing! Uh Then What?

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 8, 2010

Train  What, Me Worry

This Is Getting Serious, L.A. County Superior Court To Lay Off 329 Staffers April 1

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 8, 2010

This will probably start to ”spread like wildfire”  to courts around the State of California and the country for that matter in the next few months. 

L.A. County Superior Court to lay off 329 staffers April 1

March 8, 2010 | 11:38 am

In the first of a series of projected cuts, the Los Angeles County Superior Court will lay off 329 staff members on April 1, court officials have announced.

“Given the size of the budget cuts we have already experienced, we anticipate hundreds more layoffs to follow,” Superior Court Executive Officer John A. Clarke wrote Friday in a memo to staff.

Officials are planning to lay off an additional 500 employees in September and 530 in fall 2011, Clarke wrote. Court leaders have long warned of looming staff cuts and courtroom closures due to budget shortfalls.

Presiding Judge Charles “Tim” McCoy has said he is looking at plans to eliminate as many as 1,800 jobs and close up to 180 courtrooms to make ends meet. Court spokeswoman Vania Stuelp said the cuts will be “all across the board,” but it had not been determined whether courtrooms will be closed at the time of the layoffs.

Notices will be sent out March 16, she said.

“The most junior employees are going to be the first to go,” she said.

– Victoria Kim    

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/03/la-county-superior-court-to-lay-off-329-staffers-april-1.html

It Looks Like Education Really Does Matter

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 8, 2010

Unemployment Bt Education

www.ingerletter.com

Fannie Mae Mortgage-Bond Spreads Fall To Record: Credit Markets

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 8, 2010

Credit markets are showing (irrational) exuberance again……hard to believe, but that’s the direction we’re heading in!  Looks like the governments hand is in everything, quite literally.  You may ask how is this possible, well……before the fall of Rome, did anyone pay attention to the fingers of trouble, nope, greed overtook common sense.  I think that pretty much sums it up.

By Jody Shenn

March 8 (Bloomberg) — Yields on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage securities that guide U.S. home-loan rates are trading at the lowest relative to Treasuries on record, even as the scheduled end of Federal Reserve purchases approaches.

The difference between yields on Washington-based Fannie Mae’s current-coupon 30-year fixed-rate mortgage bonds and 10- year Treasuries narrowed 0.02 percentage point today to about 0.63 percentage point to match the smallest spread since at least 1984, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Spreads on agency mortgage bonds have held near lows while the unprecedented Fed program, in which the central bank is buying $1.25 trillion of the debt, nears its March 31 conclusion. Some investors consider the debt more attractive at tighter nominal spreads because of declines in expectations for interest-rate volatility, affecting how certain they can be about how long it will remain outstanding, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Spreads for the Fannie Mae securities on a so-called option-adjusted basis, which takes into account prepayment uncertainty, against interest-rate swaps have widened to negative 0.03 percentage point from as low as negative 0.22 percentage point on Dec. 21, according to Bloomberg data.

Elsewhere in credit markets, at least $12.3 billion of U.S. corporate bonds were marketed today, the busiest since Feb. 4 when volume reached $18.85 billion, Bloomberg data show. DirecTV, the El Segundo, California-based satellite-television provider, sold $3 billion of 5-, 10- and 30-year notes. Bank of America Corp., the largest U.S. bank by assets, sold $2.5 billion of five-year notes.

In Iran, Pars Oil & Gas Co. issued $1 billion of euro- denominated bonds to help boost the development of its giant South Pars gas field, Press TV reported. The National Iranian Oil Co., POGC’s parent, has guaranteed a return of as much as 8 percent on the debt, the state-run news channel said.

Harrah’s Entertainment Inc. debt rose in trading today after lenders agreed to extend $5.5 billion of maturities to 2015, giving the world’s biggest casino company five years to make any material repayments.

In the U.S., the cost of protecting against corporate defaults fell for a second day. The Markit CDX North America Investment-Grade Index, linked to credit-default swaps on 125 companies, declined 3 basis points to 82.5 basis points as of 2:22 p.m. in New York, according to CMA DataVision. That’s the lowest since Jan. 14. The index typically declines as investor confidence improves.

Credit-swaps pay the buyer face value if a borrower defaults in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent. A basis point equals $1,000 a year on a contract protecting against default on $10 million of debt for five years.

Full article at      http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aKXhj8HzX8Ao&pos=3

Cash-Strapped States Delay Paying Income-Tax Refunds

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 7, 2010

From Jim Sinclair…..Credit default swap OTC derivatives are weapons of real warfare. (Credit-default swaps, where you insure your neighbor’s house just to destroy it and make money from it, that’s exactly what we have to curb, according to Paul Volcker)   They are already operating against US state debt.  Soon states will be falling like bowling pins. The US dollar will follow as it drops below .7200.   Bullish for Gold.
 

Cash-Strapped States Delay Paying Income-Tax Refunds


Postd March 7, 2010

This year, more Americans and businesses may be asking: Where’s my tax refund?

That’s because cash-strapped states such as North Carolina, Alabama and Hawaii have been forced to slow down issuing income tax refunds to individuals and businesses because of a lack of funds in their budget.

Kansas has hinted that a delay might be possible, and processing paper refunds in Iowa has slowed because the state doesn’t haven’t enough employees to get them processed faster.

Another state, New York, is still considering whether they’ll follow the likes of Hawaii and delay refund payments.

“States typically do this when they are tight and they don’t have a budget in place,” said Karla Dennis, CEO of Cohesive, a nationwide tax preparation firm. Things are dire at many states: forty-one states are expected to have mid-year budget gaps totaling $37.7 billion, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Delaying the refund, Dennis says, “gives the state funds to work with in the interim to fill a gap in their revenues.”

Unintended Consequences Of The Plunger

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 7, 2010

Joe The Plumber

I Got Your Back Side Covered…….Really, I Do

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 7, 2010

I Got Your Back Side Covered (Pelosi)

The Last Drop Of Productivity From The American Working Class

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 7, 2010

Squeezing the Last Drop of Productivity from the American Working Class – 18 Percent National Underemployment and why Wall Street and the Government are Cheering Your Financial Failure.

Posted: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:04:47 +0000

The American financial press cheered on Friday when “only” 36,000 jobs were lost in February.  This if you haven’t noticed now passes for good economic news.  The unemployment rate remained unchanged because the actual workforce continued to show a decline yet Wall Street somehow viewed this as positive developments.  And why not?  The middle class is under assault from every angle.  Things are so twisted with propaganda that many Americans now believe that the banking elite are actually looking out for the well being of American workers.  As news of the job losses somehow echoed as positive developments, more and more Americans are continually being kicked out of their homes from banks they helped to bail out.  Irony has no meaning to Wall Street.

And if we look at the details of the jobs report, it turns out that 17.9 percent of Americans are either unemployed or underemployed or flat out have stopped looking for work:

Source:  BLS

This wasn’t the only spin going on in the media.  Before the jobs report came out there was a preemptive flow of information trying to justify the job cuts by blaming it on the weather.  Yes, now instead of blaming the financial catastrophe on the actual perpetrators in Wall Street who systematically looted the American system and turned our economy into a giant casino that they leeched onto, we are now to believe people are losing their jobs because of the weather:

“(CNSnews) Ahead of Friday’s announcement, Goldman Sachs predicted that the storm might skew the job loss number by as much as 100,000 – a prediction that was embraced by officials in the Obama administration.

“The blizzards that affected much of the country during the last month are likely to distort the statistics,” Larry Summers, director of the White House’s National Economic Council, said in an interview with CNBC. “So it’s going to be very important … to look past whatever the next figures are to gauge the underlying trends.”

If the storm caused a skewing of job loss numbers I wonder how many job losses can be linked to Goldman Sachs and their casino style gambling in the derivatives markets and mortgage backed securities?  Then again, people should be happy that the unemployment rate remained steady at 9.7 percent even though more Americans are working part-time with no benefits and many others have simply fallen off the payrolls.  This is supposedly the new American dream for the middle class through the eyes of Wall Street who are selling capitalism but living in a world of corporate handout socialism.

There is a new show called Undercover Boss where a CEO goes undercover to work in the trenches with the proletariat.  As it turns out, the middle class is being worked to death and as we all know, the CEO can’t even do the job most workers do on a daily basis.  Even Henry Ford understood the interworking of the cars he was putting out.  In the end the CEO reveals his identity and gives a nice little handout to the worker and all is well in TV land.  The check is a token of what CEOs actually make.  This is the ultimate reflection of our trickle down economy where those at the top act like sociopaths and rulers of the universe but when it comes to doing the daily tasks of their company, they have no clue.  This is the de facto rule running on Wall Street.  In fact, CEO pay has grown outrageously over the past few decades as the middle class has gotten poorer:

Source:  American Progress

In reality, part-time employment has spread even to poor CEOs making 300 to 400 times the average American worker salary.  Poor CEOs and Wall Street executives need time off to enjoy their tax payer funded yachts and all expense hedonism trips to the Caribbean.  They would like to convince each other that the money they have is all through their will power and market prowess but in reality it is nothing more than being part of a corporatocracy and buying out the government with an army of lobbyist and insiders.  You have to be a self indulgent narcissist to take the economy to the brink of financial destruction in the case of many Wall Street firms and still reward yourself with outrageous bailouts.  The fact that average Americans are still not protesting in mass about this tells me that many actually believe what Wall Street is saying.  You see this when many would rather blame the working class for the ills of today than focus their energy where it really needs to go.

Wall Street loves this economic crisis.  They receive trillions in bailouts yet convince the public that what is occurring today is merely the “market” correcting itself.  So as most Americans have more and more troubles keeping up with their daily bills, companies are squeezing every little excess from those currently working.  Those that have jobs out of fear will work harder and probably demand less merit increases in the current economy.  After all, the head guy is only making 300 times what you make even though he can’t even understand the main function of the organization.  So what if the low level guy is selling toxic crap to some homeless person with no income and giving him access to a $500,000 loan.  These Wall Street tycoons are big picture thinkers and can’t be worried with the day to day operations of the proletariat unless it means turning it into a caricature for mass viewing and quick TIVO access.

You don’t think productivity actually increased?  Take a look at this:

Source:  BLS

This recession has been fantastic for productivity.  Just look at the above chart.  American workers have been doing their part during this recession.  After all, now you can hire a cadre of “contract” workers and not have to pay them one cent in healthcare support or even contribute to their pension.  Once the job is done you can kick them to the curb.  After all, this is capitalism so long as those at the top have managed to setup sweetheart deals and golden parachutes.  This is how the top 1 percent makes sure their hold on 40 percent of the nation’s wealth isn’t damaged.  And if you think financial institutions deserve this bailout money and their outrageous bonuses then companies like Circuit City or Mervyns would still be around today if that model applied across the board.  But this doesn’t apply to the general economy.  This applies to Wall Street and somehow the absurdity of it all still goes on.  The worst financial crisis since the Great Depression and not one solid reform has been enacted.  26 months of job losses and nothing.  Who is running the show?

The rise of the part-time work force is nothing new as we become more and more like Japan.  Japan bailed out their financial institutions after their failed stock market and real estate bubbles popped and today, their working class is made up of one-third part-time workers:

“(LA Times) In the world’s second-largest economy, the global financial crisis has forced part-time workers such as Kudo to face a harsh new reality.

Over the last few years, temporary employees have gone from being a rarity in Japan to accounting for one-third of the workforce of 67 million. They enjoy far fewer protections than full-time workers — placing their necks squarely on the layoff chopping block.

By March, the government predicts, 85,000 part-timers will fall prey to haken-giri, or temporary-worker cutbacks — a relatively small number compared with U.S. layoffs but high for a nation where job security has long been a staple.

On Wednesday, embattled Prime Minister Taro Aso made the plight of part-timers a major piece of a proposed stimulus package. Aso pledged to create 1.6 million jobs, partly by turning part-time jobs into full-time ones.”

Japan’s headline unemployment rate is 4.9 percent.  Just like our headline unemployment rate, the devil is really in the details.  If we continue on this path part-time work may be all that is left.

This was the fine work of     www.mybudget360.com

Volcker Says Euro To Survive As Greek Budget Crisis Manageable

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 7, 2010

Paul Volcker……..Volcker used his speech to lay out the reasoning behind the so-called Volcker Rule that underpins the legislation sent by President Barack Obama to Congress this past week. He also pointed to the “abuse” of derivatives to massage Greece’s budget deficit as a reason to tighten regulation of the securities.“Surely the recent revelations about the use (and abuse) of complex derivatives in obscuring the extent of Greek financial obligations reinforces the need for greater transparency and less complexity,” Volcker said in his speech yesterday.
 
Volcker Says Euro to Survive as Greek Budget Crisis Manageable

By Rainer Buergin and Philipp Encz

March 7 (Bloomberg) — Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker said European officials are lucky that the euro region’s first major crisis was sparked by one of its smaller members and he’s confident the currency will survive.

“I’m still a believer in the euro,” Volcker said in an interview in Berlin yesterday. The lack of a unified government to back up the European Central Bank is a “structural crack” and “maybe fortunately it’s tested with a country as small as Greece, which doesn’t present an insuperable financing problem.”

The euro’s founding treaty sets out no rules on how a struggling member nation could be rescued and didn’t establish a single finance ministry, prompting billionaire investor George Soros to say on Feb. 28 that the currency “may not survive” the crisis.

Greece, which announced a further round of deficit cutting measures last week, managed to sell 5 billion euros ($6.8 billion) of new 10-year bonds on March 4, which Volcker called “a good sign.” At 12.7 percent of gross domestic product, Greece’s deficit was the highest in the 27-nation European Union last year.

A “combination of very strong measures and availability of money” may help solve the Greek problem and stop contagion spreading to other euro nations, said Volcker, who was in the German capital to give a speech to the American Academy in Berlin, a transatlantic research institute.

Harvard University Professor Martin Feldstein, who warned in 1997 that European monetary union would spark greater political conflict, said Feb. 12 that the euro “isn’t working.” Soros said 10 days later that if EU members don’t take the next step toward political union, the common currency may disintegrate.

While EU leaders on Feb. 11 pledged to safeguard financial stability in the euro area as a whole, no mechanism has been set up for doing that, Soros said.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who met with him the same day, said the question of a bailout “absolutely doesn’t arise” and the steps taken in Greece to cut the deficit make her optimistic that a rescue won’t be needed.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who meets Papandreou in Paris today, said yesterday the EU must support Greece or risk destroying the euro.

Volcker used his speech to lay out the reasoning behind the so-called Volcker Rule that underpins the legislation sent by President Barack Obama to Congress this past week. He also pointed to the “abuse” of derivatives to massage Greece’s budget deficit as a reason to tighten regulation of the securities.

“Surely the recent revelations about the use (and abuse) of complex derivatives in obscuring the extent of Greek financial obligations reinforces the need for greater transparency and less complexity,” Volcker said in his speech yesterday.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aGUcqkSNUJwY&pos=4

China To Nullify Financing Guarantees By Local Governments

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 7, 2010

Does that make them (you know the old saying)…. indian traders?   This doesn’t sound good, to say the least!   It will also likely effect aspects of world markets in commodities, real estate and stock markets because they’ve been a large part of world growth.     China plans to nullify all guarantees local governments have provided for loans taken by their financing vehicles as concerns about credit risks on such debt surges. A crackdown on local- government borrowing, estimated at about 24 trillion yuan ($3.5 trillion) by Northwestern University Professor Victor Shih, could trigger a gigantic wave of bad loans as projects are left without funding, Shih said this month. Beijing’s fiscal situation probably isn’t as good as it looks at first glance, said Brian Jackson, an emerging markets strategist at Royal Bank of Canada in Hong Kong. Perhaps at some stage the central government is going to have to bail out the banks or the regional governments and take it on its own balance sheet
 
  
China to Nullify Financing Guarantees by Local Governments

By Bloomberg News

 

March 8 (Bloomberg) — China plans to nullify all guarantees local governments have provided for loans taken by their financing vehicles as concerns about credit risks on such debt surges.

The Ministry of Financewill also ban all future guarantees by local governments and legislatures in rules that may be issued as soon as this month, Yan Qingmin, head of the banking regulator’s Shanghai branch, said in an interview. The ministry held meetings on the rules on Feb. 25 with regulators including the China Banking Regulatory Commission and the People?s Bank of China, Yan said March 5.

China’s local governments are raising funds through investment vehicles to circumvent regulations that prevent them from borrowing directly. A crackdown on local- government borrowing, estimated at about 24 trillion yuan ($3.5 trillion) by Northwestern University Professor Victor Shih, could trigger a gigantic wave of bad loans as projects are left without funding, Shih said this month.

“Beijing’s fiscal situationprobably isn’t as good as it looks at first glance, said Brian Jackson, an emerging markets strategist at Royal Bank of Canada in Hong Kong. Perhaps at some stage the central government is going to have to bail out the banks or the regional governments and take it on its own balance sheet.

Central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan said March 6 during the National People’s Congress that while many local financing vehicles have the ability to repay, two types cause concern. One uses land as collateral, while the other can’t fully repay borrowing, meaning that the local governments may be liable, leading to fiscal risks.

Premier Wen Jiabao, at the opening of the annual parliamentary meetings last week, said the central government would sell 200 billion yuan of bonds for a second year to help local governments fund infrastructure projects. Wen also warned of latent risks in China’s banking system as he pledged to continue a moderately loose monetary policy and a proactive fiscal stance.

The parliamentary meetings will end March 14 with Premier Wen’s annual press conference in Beijing.

A few cities and counties may face very large repayment pressure in coming years because of debt ratios already exceeding 400 percent, a person with knowledge of the matter said in January. The ratio is of year-end outstanding debt to annual disposable fiscal income.

The financing vehicles of large coastal cities are well-funded as most have publicly traded subsidiaries that can raise capital from the marketsand rely less on bank loans. Entities in northern and western China are of particular concern, the banking regulator’s Yan said while attending the parliamentary meetings.

The 1998 collapse of Guangdong International Trust & Investment Corp., which borrowed domestically and overseas on behalf of southern China’s Guangdong province, left creditors including Dresdner Bank AG of Germany and Bank One Corp. in the U.S. with $3 billion of unpaid bonds. It marked the first time that Chinese authorities failed to bail out one of the nation’s state-owned trusts.

Commercial bankshave already been told to assess their exposure to such lending and stop providing further credit if problems are found, Yan said.

China’s banks doled out a combined 9.59 trillion yuan in new loans last year, helping the government engineer a turnaround in the world’s third-largest economy. The credit binge sparked concern about more bad loans and asset bubbles.

Northwestern’s Shih estimated that borrowing by China’s 8,000 local-government entities may have totaled 11.429 trillion yuan in outstanding debt by the end of last year and they had credit lines with banks for an additional 12.767 trillion yuan. That may result in bad loans of up to 3 trillion yuan.

China’s banks had 497 billion yuan of non-performing loans as of Dec. 31, accounting for 1.58 percent the nation’s total advances, according to the banking regulator.

Luo Jun, Kevin Hamlin. With assistance from Zhang Dingmin in Beijing. Editors: John Liu, Richard Dobson.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aIcTfdm5rWdY&pos=2

Nonfarm Payroll Data Breakdown

Posted By thestatedtruth.com on March 6, 2010

  Labor Stats

www.ingerletter.com